Virtual version of the museum as a means of introducing digital technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2019-2(13)-3Abstract
Problem setting. The issue of legal regulation of the digitization of museums is currently relevant and deserves special attention, since digital transformation at an effective level is necessary for both rare objects (museum cultural values) and modern ones. Creating a modern digital space for museum cultural values will be appropriate for: both visitors, owners and authors of museum cultural values, and outside investors and the museum.
The purpose. Analysis of the “virtual version of the museum” category as a means of introducing digital technologies and defining its features, mechanism for realization and protection of digital works rights, which are in the repository of the museum site.
Analysis of recent research and publications. At the scientific level, scientists, such as A. G. Vasnev, A. V. Goloviznin, S. G. Dolgov, T. V. Dudenko, V. F. Zverhovskaya, I. E. Martynenko, V. Yu. Stepanov, B. M. Odaynyk, but were considered exclusively within the framework of the legal regulation of the circulation of cultural values. The issues of digitization of museums dealt with such scientists as M. A. Belyaeva, T. A. Ladygina, N. V. Klementyevа, K. D. Savitskaya, but more from the point of view of general issues, without affecting the features of the virtual version of the museums.
Article’s main body. Virtual excursion is the result of creative activity, presented in electronic (digital) form, by means of spherical or cylindrical panoramas, based on the interactive interaction of the user (visitor) with the virtual environment through a computer program for visual demonstration of digital works that are to be expressed electronically (digitally) and located on the museum’s website.
Digitization of museum cultural values is one of the most promising areas in the field of introduction of high technologies and automation for museum cultural values.
“Digitalization” should provide every citizen with equal access to cultural information and knowledge services provided through digital technologies. The implementation of this principle is possible when implementing a virtual version of the museum.
The author defines the essence of the category “virtual version of the museum” and reveals its features. The article states that when visiting a virtual tour, the visitor can receive the following electronic services in the field of culture and the arts (paid / free), in particular, 1) view the virtual panorama by going to different halls of the museum, 2) explore museum exhibits that are museum cultural values, 3) get information about museum cultural values and more.
Conclusions. According to the results of research, the expediency of positioning the museum in the Web space is established and the necessity of introducing a virtual version of the museum as a means of introduction of digital technologies is substantiated.
The author found that if the museum site has a repository of digital photographs, which are viewed through virtual tours, access to such a site or content must be based on the copyright and copyright of the digital author himself.
References
Vasnev, O. G. (2006). Pravovoye regulirovaniye oborota kulturnykh tsennostey: extended abstract of candidate’s thesis / Kuban. gos. agrar. un-t. Krasnodar [in Russian].
Goloviznin, A. V. (2006). Grazhdansko-pravovoye regulirovaniye oborota kulturnykh tsennostey: candidate’s thesis / Uralskaya gos. yuridich. akademiya. Ekaterinburg [in Russian].
Dolgov, S. G. (2000). Kulturnyye tsennosti kak obyekty grazhdanskikh prav i ikh zashchita (grazhdansko-pravovoy i kriminalisticheskiy aspekty): extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moskva [in Russian].
Dudenko, T. V. (2017). Tsyvilno-pravova okhorona prav na kulturni tsinnosti ta yikh oborotozdatnist: candidate’s thesis / Natsionalnyi yurydychnyi Universytet imeni Yaroslava Mudroho. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Zverkhovska ,V. F. (2015). Kulturni tsinnosti yak obiekty tsyvilnykh prav: candidate’s thesis / Natsionalnyi Universytet «Odeska yurydychna akademiia» Odesa [in Ukrainian].
Martynenko, I. E. (2012). Mezhdunarodnaya i natsionalnyye pravovyye sistemy okhrany istoriko-kulturnogo naslediya gosudarstv-uchastnikov SNG. Moskva : Zertsalo [in Russian].
Stepanov, V. Yu. (2015). Vyznachennia poniattia «kulturna spadshchyna» v kulturnomu prostori Ukrainy. Kultura Ukrainy. Seriia: Kulturolohiia – Culture of Ukraine. Cultural science series, issue 48, 29-39. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Kukl_2015_48_5 [in Ukrainian].
Odainyk, B. M. (2009). Osnovni vyznachennia terminiv, poviazanykh z pravovym poniattiam «kulturna spadshchyna»: problemni pytannia. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu – Bulletin of the Odessa National University, Vol. 14, issue 9: Pravoznavstvo, 125-129 [in Ukrainian].
Belyayeva, M. A. Ladygina, T. A. (2018). Novyye muzeynyye kommunikatsii: tsifrovaya pere zagruzka. Mir nauki. Sotsiologiya. filologiya. kulturologiya. – The world of science. Sociology, philology, cultural studies, No. 4. URL: https://sfk-mn.ru/PDF/09KLSK418.pdf [in Russian].
Klementyeva, N. V. (2018). Informatsionnyye tekhnologii v sovremennom muzeynom prostarnstve. Nauchnoye obozreniye – Scientific review, 1, 1-8. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/informatsionnye-tehnologii-vsovremennom-muzeynom-prostranstve [in Russian].
Savitskaya K. D. Ponyatiye i pravovoy rezhim virtualnykh ekskursiy. Pravovaya zashchita intellektualnoy sobstvennosti: problemy teorii i praktiki: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Novopolotsk. 17–18 maya 2019 g.) – Legal protection of intellectual property: problems of theory and practice: Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference. Novopolotsk, 106-109 [in Russian].
Martynenko I. E., Rozgon O. V. Osobennosti obespecheniya sokhrannosti obyektov kulturnogo naslediya po zakonodatelstvu Belarusi i Ukrainy. Pravo ta іnnovatsії – Law and innovation, 3. 26 [in Russian].
Inklyuzivnyy sayt Muzeya Khanenko. URL: https://bodnarchuk.com.ua/artscience-ii-vystavka-pro-novitni-metodydoslidzhennya-kartyn-u-muzeyi-hanenkiv/?fbclid=IwAR3D-YBjKohQK9oUtxDkk35OnIIYU8TYxeswPbEtTPGX 29Vwt2lSN0v_8mk.
Menshikov I. A. Sovremennyye sredstva vizualizatsii: sozdaniye virtualnykh ekskursiy na osnove tekhnologii 3D-panoramnoy skhemki. URL: http://elib.sfukras.ru/bitstream/handle/2311/4372/1217.pdf?sequence=1.
Virtualnyye muzei: ispolzuyemyye tekhnologii i analiz peredovogo opyta razrabotki. (2013). Grani poznaniya – Verge of knowledge, 2, 9 [in Russian].
Mamontova M. S. (2016). Praktika otsifrovki muzeynykh fondov (na primere muzeyev g. Yoshkar-Oly). Innovatsionnaya nauka – Innovative science, 2, 173-175 [in Russian].
V Parizhe prokhodit interaktivnaya vystavka rabot Van Goga: vpechatlyayushchiye foto. Bukvi. URL:https://bykvu.com/ua/pictures/111673-v-parizhe-prokhodit-interaktivnaya-vystavka-rabot-van-goga-vpechatlyayushchie-foto [in Russian].
Novyye tekhnologii. kotoryye zastavyat «millenialov» khodit v muzei. MART. Portal o muzeynykh tekhnologiyakh i marketinge. URL: http://mart-museum.ru/mart_articles/new_ technology_ involvingvisitors [in Russian].
V Ukraine tozhe khotyat otsifrovat kulturnoye naslediye. Fokus – Focus. URL: https://focus.ua/ukraine/437375-v_ukraine_khotiat_otsifrovat_kulturnoe_nasledie [in Russian].
Tsyrkun O. G. (2017). Aktualnyye problemy avtorskogo prava v tsifrovuyu epokhu. Pravovaya zashchita intellektualnoy sobstvennosti: problemy teorii i praktiki: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Novopolotsk. 17–18 maya 2019 g.) – Legal protection of intellectual property: problems of theory and practice: Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference. Novopolotsk [in Russian].
