Problem of Legal Providing of Public and Private Interests Balance in the Investment Relations Field

Authors

  • Boychuk R. P. NDI PZIR

Abstract

Problem setting. Ensuring an optimal balance of public and private interests in investment relationships is a prerequisite for creating a favorable investment climate, boosting the investment market, and wide attracting of national and foreign investment. The most important part of the balance of public and private interests in investment legal relations is legislative regulation that develops and protects investment relations, including the legal mechanism of state guarantees and protection of investments, legal rights and interests of participants of investment activity. Analysis of recent research and publications. Significant contribution to the formation of theoretical, methodological and practical aspects of investment support of socio-economic development of the country on the basis of state regulation of investment activity have been made by such leading scientists as: Yu.E. Atamanova, D. V. Zadhaylo, V. K. Mamutov, O. P. Podtserkovny, V. A. Ustimenko, V. S. Shcherbyna, O. M. Vinnik and others. Article’s main body. The problem of legal regulation of the balance of private and public interests in the field of investment relations has been investigated. The interaction of the state and economic entities in the field of investment activity consists in the integrated application of legal, administrative, economic and propaganda methods to create conditions for the effective activity of the latter and to achieve the optimal level of economic and social development of society. The complex of these methods should be considered as a single economic and legal mechanism of state regulation of investment activity in order to ensure the balance of private and public in this area. Conclusions and prospects for the development. Being constantly dependent on the efficiency of enterprises, the state, in turn, affects the economic processes that take place on them by adopting laws that activate or slow down investment activity, using mechanisms and means of management, regulation and stimulation. The influence of the state should be made on the basis of the allocation of four blocks of state regulatory influence on the efficiency of economic activity of enterprises. Firstly, ensuring the creation of the required volume of product demanded by society; second, the reproduction of the money spent on creating a product; thirdly, the development of a newly created value – profit, part of which, through the system of tax deductions, should be directed to the state budget used for life support of the country; fourthly – ensuring the expanded reproduction and successful implementation of social programs.

References

Pro ratyfikatsiiu Uhody pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym

spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony: Uhodu ratyfikovano iz zaiavoiu

Zakonom # 1678-VII vid 16.09.2014. [On ratification of the Association Agreement between Ukraine, on the one

hand, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, on the other hand:

The treaty was ratified with a statement by Law No. 1678-VII of 16.09.2014.] (2014). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady –

Supreme Council of Ukraine, 40, Art. 2021 [in Ukrainian].

Elkins, Z., Guzman, A., Simmons, B. (2006). Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties,

–2000. International Organ. Vol. 60. P. 811 [in English].

Mills, A. (2011). Antinomies of public and private at the foundations of international investment law and arbitration.

Journal of International Economic Law. Vol. 14. No2. P. 480 [in English].

Schill, S. (2009).The Multilateralization of International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Par. 108 [in English]

Tikhomirov, Yu.A. (2002). Pravo i publichnyy interes. Zakonodatelstvo i ekonomika – Law and public interest, 3.

(215), 4–7 [in Russian].

Tecmed v United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003, par. 154. LG&E v Argentina,

ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1, 3 October 2006, par. 131 [in English].

SGS v Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6, 29 January 2004, par. 116 [in English].

Nuriyev, A.Kh. (2011). K voprosu o tselesoobraznosti deleniya prava na chastnoye i publichnoye. Leningradskiy

yuridicheskiy zhurnal – On the issue of the appropriateness of dividing the right to private and public, 2 (24),

–216 [in Russian].

Nuriyev, A.Kh. (2013). Mesto balansa chastnykh i publichnykh interesov v razvitii mezhdunarodnogo investitsionnogo

prava. Mezhdunarodnoye publichnoye i chastnoye pravo – The place of balance of private and public interests in the

development of international investment law, 5 [in Russian].

Zharovska, I.M. (2010). Publichni ta pryvatni interesy u mekhanizmi suchasnoi derzhavnoi vlady [Public and private

interests in the mechanism of modern state power] Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskoho universytetu – Scientific herald

of Chernivtsi University. Science of law, 525, 33–37, lawreview.chnu.edu.ua. URL: http: // lawreview.chnu.edu.ua/

visnuk.php?lang=ua [in Ukrainian].

Kozlov, A.Yu. (2009). Obespecheniye balansa publichnykh i chastnykh interesov v protsesse vozmezdnogo

otchuzhdeniya nedvizhimogo imushchestva. nakhodyashchegosya v federalnoy sobstvennosti. [Ensuring the balance

of public and private interests in the process of foreclosure of immovable property in federal ownership] Extended

abstract of Candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].

Logacheva, N.Yu. (2006). Balans chastnykh i publichnykh interesov pri postroyenii ekonomicheskikh otnosheniy

kak usloviye formirovaniya demokraticheskogo pravovogo gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva. [The balance

of private and public interests in the construction of economic relations as a condition for the formation of a democratic

rule of law and civil society]. Yuridicheskiye zapiski. Grazhdanskoye obshchestvo i gosudarstvo Rossii: obespecheniye

demokratii i pravomernosti – Legal notes. Civil Society and the State of Russia (Starilova Yu.N. Eds.). Voronezh, 20,

–99 [in Russian].

Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 1 hrudnia 2004 r. # 1 – 10/204 u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam

narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo ofitsiinoho tlumachennia okremykh polozhen chastyny pershoi statti 4

Tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy (sprava pro okhoroniuvanyi zakonom interes). Rishennia vid 01.12.2004

# 18 [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of December 1, 2004 No. 1–10/204 in the case on the

constitutional petition of 50 MPs regarding the official interpretation of certain provisions of part one of Article 4 of

the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine (case on the protection of law interest). Decision No. 18 of December 01, 2004]

rada.gov.ua URL: rada.gov.ua/ rp / 2004 [in Ukrainian].

Pro zasady derzhavnoi rehuliatornoi polityky u sferi hospodarskoi diialnosti. Zakon Ukrainy. [About the principles

of state regulatory policy in the field of economic activity.] (2004) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy – Supreme

Council of Ukraine, 9, 79 [in Ukrainian].

Zahalnoi deklaratsii prav liudyny [The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.] (2008). Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy. –

Official Bulletin of Ukraine, 93, 89, 3103 [in Ukrainian].

Pro investytsiinu diialnist: Zakon Ukrainy vid 18.09.1991 r. # 1560-KhII. [About investment activity] (1991).

Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy – Supreme Council of Ukraine, 47, 646 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2022-03-16

Issue

Section

Articles