Innovative Technologies in the Mechanism of Judicial Power Transparency Ensuring

Authors

  • Rubtsov S. S. NDI PZIR

Abstract

Problem setting. The principle of transparency is one of the main requirements to the organization and activity of public authorities, it’s an integral part of the democratic law state. It gets the particular importance concerning with the functioning of the judicial power. The transparency level is directly proportional to the confidence level in the court. The validity of mentioned position proves by the today practice. The trust level to the judiciary in Ukraine has been increased last time. We believe that this is the result of the significant change in communication policy of the judiciary, particularly, of judicial authorities and in judicial activity informatization. Despite of some progress towards the implementation of innovative technologies in the judiciary proceedings, their potential is not used in full capacity. This is extremely negative and significantly reduces the possibility of a court and trial participants. That is why this issue should be studied. Analysis of resent researches and publications. Some issues of the judiciary transparency have been studied by such scientists as L. M. Moskvich, O. O. Ovsyannikova, V. V. Gorodovenko, O. Ju. Dudchenko and others. Article’s main body. The article analyzed the ways to improve the innovative technologies using in the court. According to the author’s opinion, According to the author, it will improve the quality of the judiciary transparency. The current state of e-justice in Ukraine has been analyzed; also the author suggested the proposals of its functioning improving. In particular, the attention focused on the need to combine all the features provided by electronic court in one service. In addition, the author expressed the ideas about the video fixation of litigation and the possibility to file the procedural documents electronically. The author also estimates the benefits of innovative technologies using in the court administration. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The introduction of innovative technologies in the judiciary allows to simplificate this procedure and enhances its transparency and accessibility. It allows reducing the dependence of courts from the media in shaping their image. In turn, it promotes the social efficiency of the court, its public authority, and trust level, credibility in the public consciousness and in the state mechanism. However, we should realize the need of reasonable balance between the technology using and respect for the role of judge.

References

Ovsiannikova O. O. (2008) Transparentnist sudovoi vlady: poniattia ta zmist [Transparency of the judiciary: the concept and content]. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy. – Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 4, 228–237. [In Ukrainian]. 2. Yaroshenko V. M. (2012) Transparentnist ta vidkrytist vlady yak mekhanizmy stanovlennia instytutu demokratychnoi hromadianskosti [Transparency and open government as mechanisms of formation of the Institute for Democratic Citizenship]. Naukovi pratsi. Politolohiia. – Proceedings. Politology, 170, 85–91. [In Ukrainian]. 3. Moskvych L. M. (2011) Efektyvnist sudovoi systemy: kontseptualnyi analiz [Efficiency of the judicial system: a conceptual analysis]. Kh. FINN [In Ukrainian]. 4. Opytuvannia naselennia Ukrainy, shchodo sudovoi systemy 2007, 2009 rr. [The survey population of Ukraine, regarding the judiciary 2007, 2009]. fair.org.ua Retrieved from: http://www.fair.org.ua/content/library_doc/Judiciary_ presentation_2009.pdf. [In Ukrainian]. 5. Otsenka raboty sudebnoy sistemy Ukrainy [Evaluation of the judicial system of Ukraine] rb.com.ua Retrieved from: http://rb.com.ua/rus/projects/omnibus/8998/. [In Russian]. 6. Klymenko I. V. (2014) Elektronni posluhy [Electronic Services] (N. V. Hrytsiak Ed). K. : NADU pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy [In Ukrainian]. 7. Recommendation CM/Rec (2009) 1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on electronic democracy (e-democracy) (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 February 2009 at the 1049th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies). coe.int Retrieved from: http://www.coe.int/t/dgap/democracy/Activities/GGIS/CAHDE/Default_en.asp. [In English]. 8. Lohinova N. I. (2014) Uprovadzhennia elektronnoho pravosuddia v systemu sudochynstva [Implementation of e-justice in the legal system] Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava. – Actual problems of law, 429–434. [In Ukrainian]. 9. Rekomendatsiia Rec (2001) 3 KM RIe derzhavam-chlenam «Shchodo nadannia hromadianam sudovykh ta inshykh yurydychnykh posluh z vykorystanniam novitnikh tekhnolohii» [Recommendation Rec (2001) 3 CM CE member states «On providing citizens with judicial and other legal services with advanced technology»]scourt.gov.ua Retrieved from: http://www.scourt.gov.ua/clients/vsu/vsu.nsf/(documents)/7442A47EB0B374B9C2257D8700495F8B [In Ukrainian]. 10. Reyling D. Informatsionnyye tekhnologii v sudakh Evropy: mneniya. praktika i innovatsii [Information Technology in the European courts: opinions, practices and innovations] (n.d.)home.hccnet.nl Retrieved from: http://home.hccnet.nl/ a.d.reiling/html/Information%20Technology%20in%20courts%20in%20Europe%20Russian%20version.pd [In Russian]. 11. Reitynh informatsiinoi vidkrytosti: sudy vyshchoho ta apeliatsiinoho rivnia [Rating of information transparency, higher courts and appellate level] (n.d.) ombudsman.gov.ua Retrieved from: http://www.ombudsman.gov.ua/ua/all- news/pr/rejting-informatsijnoii-vidkritosti-sudi-vischogo-ta-apelyatsijnogo-rivnya/. [In Ukrainian].

Published

2022-04-04

Issue

Section

Articles