Mistakes at Acceptance of Tactical Decisions

Authors

  • Bululukov O. Yu. NDI PZIR

Abstract

Problem setting. Mistakes are assumed at the acceptance of tactical decisions in the process of investigation of crimes, reduce the evidential value of the got information, and quite often draw to its loss. Actuality of research of this problem is conditioned by the presence of errors in inquisitional activity that negatively influence on efficiency of investigation. Analysis of resent researches and publication. The separate questions of research of mistakes in a criminal trial we find out in works of such scientists as: R. S. Belkin, V. D. Bernaz, A. D. Boikov, V. I. Vlasov, N. L. Granate, G. A. Zorin, N. I. Klimenko, A. B. Soloviev, S. А. Sheifer and other. Target of research. The aim of the article is research of mistakes of investigator at the acceptance of tactical decisions and forming of their classification. Article’s main body. In the article considered, present in criminalistics and criminal and procedural literature classifications of inquisitional mistakes and their kinds are adopted. Attention is accented on complication of determination of types of mistakes in connection with many-sided nature of reasons of their origin. Correlation of judicial and tactical mistakes of investigator is considered showing up at investigation. Likeness and distinction of concepts «Tactical mistake» and «mistake are adopted at the acceptance of tactical decision». In the article specified, that at choice tactical decision have influence inherent to the investigator of quality of personality, its ability to decide intellectual tasks. Errors at the acceptance of tactical decisions are examined in relation to the stages of forming of theoretical construction of tactical decision, to that behave: а) preparatory; b) decision-making; c) practical realization. As it applies to the adopted stages there is classification of the mistakes assumed at the acceptance of tactical decisions are done. Conclusions and prospects for the development. Research and classification of mistakes of investigator expose principal reasons of their origin at an acceptance and practical realization of tactical decisions that matters for perfection of inquisitional and judicial activity. It should be noted that the use the brought classification over of mistakes by persons accepting administrative decisions, will allow to avoid them at making decision and in the different spheres of economic activity.

References

Belkin R. S. Kriminalistika: problemyi segodnyashnego dnya (Forensics: Problems of Today), R. S. Belkin, M., Norma, 2001, 240 р. 2. Bernaz V. D. K voprosu o logicheskih oshibkah pri reshenii kriminalisticheskih zadach (On the Question of Logical Errors in Solving Forensic Tasks), V. D. Bernaz, Aktualnyie problemyi ugolovnogo protsessa i kriminalistiki na sovremennom etape: Sb. nauch. trudov, Odessa, 1993, Р. 230–231. 3. Vlasov V. I. Rassledovanie prestupleniy. Problemyi kachestva (Investigation of Crimes. Quality Problems), V. I. Vlasov. [pod red. V. M. Paradeeva], Saratov, Izd-vo Saratovskogo un-ta, 1988, 199 р. 4. Granat N. L. Sledstvennyie oshibki: ponyatie, vidyi i prichinyi (Investigative Error: Concept, Types and Causes), N. L. Granat, Nauchnaya informatsiya po voprosam borbyi s prestupnostyu, M., VIIPP, 1983, Р. 57–61. 5. Zorin G. A. Kriminalisticheskaya metodologiya (Criminalistic Methodology), G. A. Zorin, Minsk, 2000, 607 р. 6. Zorin G. A. Kriminalisticheskaya metodologiya preodoleniya latentnyih oshibok: ucheb. posobie po kursu «Kriminalistika». Ch. 1: Harakteristika i klassifikatsiya latentnyih sledstvennyih oshibok (Criminalistic Methodology to Overcome Latent Bugs: Proc. Manual for the Course «Criminology». Part 1: Characteristics and Classification of Latent Investigative Errors), G. A. Zorin, V. I. Levonets, Grodno, Izd-vo GrGU, 1994, 79 р. 7. Klimenko N. I. Oshibki pri ispolzovanii spetsialnyih znaniy v dosudebnyih stadiyah ugolovnogo protsessa (Errors When Using of Special Knowledge in Pre-Trial Stages of the Criminal Process), N. I. Klimenko, Problemyi dalneyshego ukrepleniya sotsialisticheskoy zakonnosti pri rassledovanii prestupleniy organami vnutrennih del. Mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr., K., NIiRIO KVSh MVD SSSR im. F. E. Dzerzhinskogo, 1988, Р. 126–133. 8. Ozhegov S. I. Slovar russkogo yazyika (Dictionary of Russian Language), S. I. Ozhegov, N. Yu. Shvedova, 19-e izd. M., Rus. yaz., 1987, 750 р. 9. Omelchenko O. Zahalna kharakterystyka slidchykh pomylok (General Characteristics of Investigative Errors), O. Omelchenko, Pidpryiemstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, 2008, No. 5, Р. 138–139. 10. Sledstvennyie oshibki, ih prichinyi i puti ustraneniya na predvaritelnom sledstvii i v sude (The Investigating Errors, Their Causes and Ways of Eliminating the Preliminary Investigation and in Court), I. F. Demidov, L. P. Ismakaev, E. I. Konah, V. F. Kuchumova, V. I. Lazareva i dr., Voprosyi borbyi s prestupnostyu, M., Yurid. lit., 1988, Vyip. 46, Р. 182–190. 11. Uzunova O. Informatsiini prychyny yurydychnykh pomylok (za materialamy kryminalnykh sprav) (Information Reasons of Legal Errors (for Criminal Cases)), O. Uzunova, P. Uzunov, Dzherelo i pravo: materialy Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii. Mykolaiv, 27–28 lystopada 2009, Mykolaiv, ILION, 2009, Р. 303–304. 12. Sheifer S. A. Dokazatelstva y dokazivanye po uholovnim delam: problemi teorii i pravovoho rehulyrovanyia (Evidence and Proof in Criminal Matters: Problems of Theory and Legal Regulation), S. A. Sheifer, M., Norma, Ynfra-M., 2012, 240 р.

Published

2022-04-22

Issue

Section

Articles