Overview of Theoretical Approaches to Understanding the Absolute Right
Abstract
problem setting. This article is a review of theoretical approaches to understanding the absolute rights. Unbiased law regulating social relations arising from the various objects of civil law, primarily fixes these objects by members of civil relations and sets them to the default behavior within the model quite right. Therefore, the legal theory of the concept of absolute rights can not be overstated. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Special attention is paid to problems of absolute rights in the writings of well-known scholars in the field of in civil law: A. O Rybalov, K. Z. Hasanov, A. V. Stremoukhov, A. N. Plate, R. O. Khalfina, V. K. Reicher, D. D. Grimm, S. F. Kechekyan, V. F. Popondopulo and others. Target of research. The purpose of this paper is a review of theoretical approaches to understanding the absolute rights and brief assessment. Article’s main body. The study points of view on the understanding of absolute rights suggests that their diversity has arisen due to different terminological and methodological application of the concept of «absolute right». This leads to a comparison or confrontation between different or identical categories. This approach, of course, can occur in legal theory as described for the synthesis, but not always justified. This method often is probable substitution of concepts, a false perception of the nature of legal phenomena arbitrary use of terminology like. To resolve this probability must first be defined with concepts that serve the same approach in the survey. For example, it is known that the term «law» is used to refer to several lawyers not identical concepts. In one case, it covers the objective law in the other – a subjective right, in the third – the relationship in the fourth – capacity, in the fifth – the legitimate interest of others. Of course, these phenomena are related. However, each of them are relatively independent, the content of which is different and always has limited application. Thus, it seems that the confrontation between them is not entirely correct, and substitution of concepts leads to erroneous conclusions. The need for terminological distinction between the study of absolute rights repeatedly emphasized in the legal literature. Conclusions and prospects for the development. Conclusions the author of the article will further deepen the level of research not only general provisions, but certain types of absolute rights and indicate the need for such research.
References
Lapach v. A. Sistema ob’ektov grazhdanskih prav: teoriya i sudebnaya praktika (System objects of civil rights: theory and judicial practice), v. A. Lapach, M. : Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2002, p. 568.
Ryibalov A. O. Problemyi klassifikatsii grazhdanskih pravootnosheniy (Problems of classification of civil matters), dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk, 12.00.03, A. O. Ryibalov, SPb., 2007, p. 221.
Bahin S. v. O klassifikatsii prav cheloveka, provozglashennyih v mezhdunarodnyih soglasheniyah (Classification of human rights enshrined in international agreements), S. v. Bahin, Pravovedenie, 1991, No. 2, pp. 41–51.
Stremouhov A. v. Chelovek i ego pravovaya zaschita. Teoreticheskie problemyi (Man and his legal defense. theoretical problems), A. v. Stremouhov, SPb., 1996, p. 375.
Rostovschikov I. v. Prava lichnosti v Rossii: ih obespechenie i zaschita organami vnutrennih del (Individual rights in Russia: their maintenance and protection of law enforcement agencies), I. v. Rostovschikov, volgograd, 1997, p. 190.
Gasanov k. k. Absolyutnyie prava cheloveka i ogranicheniya prav (Absolute human rights and limitations of rights) [Elektronniy resurs], k. k. Gasanov, A. v. Stremouhov, Pravovedenie, 2004, No. 1, Rezhim dostupu: http://www.law.edu.ru/article/article. asp?articleID=1164805.
kartashkin v. A. Problema svobodyi i prav cheloveka v sovremennoy ideologicheskoy borbe (the problem of freedom and human rights in the contemporary ideological struggle), v. A. kartashkin, N. M. keyzerov, D. A. kerimov, I. A. Ledyah i dr., pod red. D. A. kerimova, v. M. Chhikvadze, M., Politizdat, 1986, p. 319.
korkunov N. M. Russkoe gosudarstvennoe pravo (Russian state law), t. I (vvedenie i obschaya chast), N. M. korkunov, SPb., tip. M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1908, p. 623.
kulagin M. I. Predprinimatelstvo i pravo: opyit Zapada (Business and Law: the experience of the West), M. I. kulagin, Izbrannyie trudyi, M., 1997, pp. 184–291.
Bolshaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya (the Great Soviet Encyclopedia) [Elektronniy resurs], polnyiy tekst 3-go izd., vyipusch. izd-vom «Sov. entsikl.» v 1969–1978, v 30 t, Rezhim dostupu: http://slovari.yandex.ru/dict/bse/article/00079/41500.htm.
Latyiev A. N. k voprosu ob absolyutnosti veschnyih prav. tsivilisticheskie issledovaniya (the question of absolute property rights. the civil research), A. N. Latyiev, Ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo prava, vyip. 2-y, (2005), pod red. B. L. Haskelberga, D. O. tuzova, M., Statut, 2006, p. 688.
Rimskoe chastnoe pravo : ucheb. (Roman private law), pod red. prof. I. B. Novitskogo i prof. I. S. Pereterskogo, M., Yurist’, 1996, p. 544.
Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava, pidruch. [dlia stud. yuryd. vyshch. navch. zakl.] (the general theory of law: a textbook. [for student of law schools]), M. v. tsvik, O. v. Petryshyn, L. v. Avramenko ta in., za red. d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof., akad. APrN Ukrainy M. v. tsvika, d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof., akad. APrN Ukrainy O. v. Petryshyna, kh., Pravo, 2009, p. 584.
Guliev v. E. Sotsialisticheskaya demokratiya i lichnyie prava (Socialist democracy and individual rights), v. E. Guliev, F. M. Rudinskiy, M., Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1984, p. 192.
Rimskoe chastnoe pravo (Roman private law), M., 1948, p. 380.
Pokrovskiy I. A. Osnovnyie problemyi grazhdanskogo prava (Basic problems of civil law), I. A. Pokrovskiy, M., Statut, 1998, p. 353.
Cherednikova M. v. O veschnyih pravah po Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (About Property Act under the Civil Code of the Russian Federation), M. v. Cherednikova, Aktualnyie problemyi grazhdanskogo prava, pod. red. S. S. Alekseeva, M., 2000, pp. 109–110.
Ivanov A. A. veschnoe pravo (Right in things), A. A. Ivanov, Pravovedenie, 1992, No. 1, pp. 115–120.
Mihaylovskiy I. v. Ocherki filosofii prava (Essays in the Philosophy of Law), I. v. Mihaylovskiy, tomsk, 1914, t. 1, p. 205.
Rayher v. k. Grazhdansko-pravovyie sistemyi antagonisticheskih formatsiy (Civil law system antagonistic formations), v. k. Rayher, Problemyi grazhd. i adm. prava, L., 1962, pp. 280–310.
kavelin k. D. Prava i obyazannosti po imuschestvam i obyazatelstvam v primenenii k russkomu zakonodatelstvu. Opyit sistematicheskogo obozreniya (Rights and obligations of property and obligations as applied to Russian legislation. Experience a systematic review), k. D. kavelin, Izbr. proizv. po grazhdanskomu pravu, M., 2003, p. 722.
Dozortsev v. A. Ponyatie isklyuchitelnogo prava (the notion of an exclusive right), v. A. Dozortsev, Problemyi sovremennogo grazhdanskogo prava : sb. statey, M., Gorodets, 2000, pp. 287–320.
vaskovskiy E. v. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava (textbook of civil law), E. v. vaskovskiy, M., Statut, 2003, (Klassika rossiyskoy tsivilistiki), p. 382.
Genkin D. M. Pravo sobstvennosti v SSSR (Ownership of the USSR), D. M. Genkin, M., Yuridicheskaya literatra, 1961, p. 224.
Mozolin v. P. Pravo sobstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v period perehoda k ryinochnoy ekonomike (Property rights in the Russian Federation in the period of transition to a market economy), v. P. Mozolin, M., 1992, p. 176.
Sklovskiy k. I. Primenenie grazhdanskogo zakonodatelstva o sobstvennosti i vladenii. Prakticheskie voprosyi (Application of civil law ownership and possession.practical questions), k. I. Sklovskiy. M., 2004, p. 365.
Ioffe O. S. Lichnyie neimuschestvennyie prava i ih mesto v sisteme sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava (Personal nonproperty rights and their place in the system of Soviet civil law), O. S. Ioffe, Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo, 1966, No. 7, pp. 51–59.
trifonov A. S. Osnovnyie polozheniya i harakteristika pravovogo rezhima zemel promyishlennosti (Fundamentals and characteristics of the legal regime of industrial lands), A. S. trifonov, Imuschestvennyie otnosheniya v RF, 2006, No. 1 [Elektronniy resurs], Rezhim dostupu: http://www.yurclub.ru/docs/civil/article158.html.
Suhoverhiy v. L. Lichnyie neimuschestvennyie prava v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave (Personal nonproperty rights in the Soviet civil law), avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk, v. L. Suhoverhiy, Sverdlovsk, 1970, p. 20.
Yavich L. S. Obschaya teoriya prava (General theory of Law), L. S. Yavich, L., 1976, p. 287.
Halfina R. O. Obschee uchenie o pravootnoshenii (the general doctrine of legal relationship), R. O. Halfina, M., Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1974, p. 340.
Sinayskiy v. I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo (Russian civil law), v. I. Sinayskiy, M., Statut, 2002, p. 638, (Klassika rossiyskoy tsivilistiki).
Shershenevich G. F. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava (the course of civil law), G. F. Shershenevich, tula, 2001, p. 720.
Rayher v. k. Absolyutnyie i otnositelnyie prava (Absolute and relative rights), v. k. Rayher, Izvestiya ekonomich. f-ta Leningr. politeh. in-ta. Vyip. I., 1928, pp. 141–176.
Magaziner Ya. M. Ob’ekt prava (Object of law), Ya. M. Magaziner, Ocherki po grazhdanskomu pravu : sb. st., L., 1957, pp. 65–78. 36. trubetskoy E. N. Entsiklopediya prava (Encyclopedia of law), E. N. trubetskoy, SPb., 1998, p.183.
Grimm D. D. Lektsii po dogme rimskogo prava (Lectures on doctrine of Roman law), D. D. Grimm, M., 2003, p. 496.
Denisevich E. M. Odnostoronnie sdelki v grazhdanskom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ponyatie vidyi i znachenie (Unilateral transactions in the civil law of the Russian Federation: the concept, types and value), avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk, 12.00.03 [Elektronniy resurs], E. M. Denisevich, Ekaterinburg, 2004, Rezhim dostupu: http://lawtheses.com/odnostoronniesdelki-v-grazhdanskom-prave-rossiyskoy-federatsii.
Grimm D. D. Yuridicheskoe otnoshenie i sub’ektivnoe pravo (Legal the attitude and subjective right), D. D. Grimm, Zhurnal Ministerstva yustitsii, 1897, No. 4, pp. 1–35.
Ryibalov A. O. Absolyutnyie prava i pravootnosheniya (Absolute rights and legal relationships) [Elektronniy resurs], A. O. Ryibalov, Pravovedenie, 2006, No. 1. pp. 129–142, Yuridicheskaya Rossiya, Federalnyiy pravovoy portal (v.3.3), Rezhim dostupu: http://law.edu.ru/ article/article.asp?articleID=1236857.
kechekyan S. F. Pravootnosheniya v sotsialisticheskom obschestve (Legal relationships in a socialist society), S. F. kechekyan, M., Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1958, p. 187.
Popondopulo v. F. Absolyutnyie (monopolnyie) prava predprinimatelya (Absolute (monopoly) rights of the businessman), v. F. Popondopulo, Pravovedenie, 1994, No. 1, pp. 21–30.
Stefanchuk R. O. Osobysti nemainovi prava fizychnykh osib u tsyvilnomu pravi (poniattia, zmist, systema, osoblyvosti zdiisnennia ta zakhystu) (Personal nonproperty right of private individual in civil law (concept, content, system implementation and protection features)), monohr., R. O. Stefanchuk, vidp. red. Ya. M. Shevchenko, k., kNt, 2008, p. 626.
