License agreements for the use of users’ intellectual property in the digital market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2023-2(21)-1Abstract
Digital platforms widely implement standard license agreements, according to which users grant them certain rights. And being today at an understandable stage of the establishment of these processes, several urgent questions arise – to what extent the content of such contracts is regulated at the national and international levels, how the provisions of regulatory documents are reflected in license agreements between users and platforms, how the standards for these documents take into account the needs of stakeholders. The purpose of the presented study is to determine the content of standard provisions of non-exclusive licenses offered by digital platforms, for certain industries, taking into account the norms of national and international legal documents and taking into account the balancing of the needs of interested parties. To achieve the purpose of this research, the method of scientific and legal analysis of normative documents, literature, and license agreements presented on digital platforms, as well as scientific methods of comparison and generalization, were used. Licenses are compared according to the following criteria: name, type of license, intellectual property objects, granted rights (separately – the right to grant sublicenses), term of validity, territory of validity, availability of royalties, possibility of revocation, guarantees of purity of works from third-party rights. The content of such a license is defined, which takes into account the interests of all parties in accordance with the laws and the technical needs and capabilities of the platforms. There are still unsettled aspects of the above, including at the international level – these issues may become the subject for further research. Although the digital platforms analyzed in the article are characterized by different functional features, content, target audience, etc., the proposals can be implemented regardless of these differences, but with the addition of provisions relevant to the specifics of the platform.
References
Amazon (2023). Amazon Services Business Solutions Agreement. Retrieved from: https://sellercentral.amazon. com/gp/help/1791.
Aversa, P., Haefliger, S., Hueller, F., & Reza, D. G. (2021). Customer complementarity in the digital space: Exploring Amazon’s business model diversification. Long Range Planning, 54(5), 101985. doi: 10.1016/j. lrp.2020.101985.
Berg, J., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., Rani, U., & Silberman, M. S. (2018). Digital labour platforms and the future of work. Towards decent work in the online world. Rapport de l’OIT.
Boroughf, B. (2015). The next great YouTube: improving content ID to Foster creativity, cooperation, and fair compensation. Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology, 25, 95-127.
Creative Commons (2023). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/faq/.
Flick, C. (2013). Informed consent in information technology: Improving end user licence agreements. Professionalism in the information and communication technology industry, 127-154.
Furgal, U. (2020). Reversion rights in the European Union Member States. CREATe Working Paper 2020/11.
Geiger, C., & Bulayenko, O. (2022). Creating Statutory Remuneration Rights in Copyright Law: What Policy Options Under the International Legal Framework?. Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 2020-05.
Ginsburg, J. C. (2022). Authors’ Remuneration: Reforms To Wish For. Columbia Public Law Research Paper, 122-137.
Google (2022). Google Terms and Conditions. Retrieved from: https://policies.google.com/terms?hl=ua. Indeed (2023). Service conditions. Retrieved from: https://ua.indeed.com/legal?hl=uk&from=gnavhomepage# employers.
Kur, A., & Schovsbo, J. (2011). Expropriation or fair game for all? The gradual dismantling of the IP exclusivity paradigm. Intellectual Property in a Fair World Trade System–Proposals for Reforming TRIPS, 408-451.
Lin, C. (2021). Exploration of intellectual property protection strategies for cross-border e-commerce. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 245, p. 01062). EDP Sciences.
Mantrov, V., Birstonas, R., Karklins, J., Kelli, A., Kull, I., Buka, A., ... & Davida, Z. (2022). The implementation of the new consumer sales directives in the baltic states: a step towards further harmonisation of consumer sales. New Legal Reality: Challenges and Perspectives, II, 504. Meta (2023). Terms of use. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/legal/terms.
OLX Group (2023). OLX.ua service rules. Retrieved from https://help.olx.ua/olxuahelp/s/article/%D0%BF% D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0-%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B2%D1%96% D1%81%D1%83-olxua-V1.
Peukert, C., & Windisch, M. (2023). The Economics of Copyright in the Digital Age. Center for Law & Economics Working Paper Series, 4. Retrieved from https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/ handle/20.500.11850/639999/CLE_WP_2023_04.pdf?sequence=1.
Popova, K., & Nacka, M. (2017). Intellectual property rights knowledge and awareness–academic level empirical analysis and recommendations. Journal of Contemporary Economic and Business Issues, 4(1), 41-54.
Rozetka (2023). Terms of use of the site. Retrieved from https://rozetka.com.ua/ua/pages/terms/.
Shmatkov, D. (2023). Fan art and intellectual property rights on electronic commerce platforms. Law and innovation, 2(42), 80-85. https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-10.
Shmatkov, D., & Cabrera Zagalaz, A. (2022). Notice-and-Takedown Procedures in Ukraine, Spain, China and the US. Law and innovative society, 1(18), 22–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2022-1(18)-2.
Shmatkov, D., Hlibko, S., Tokarieva, K., & Zagalaz, J. C. (2021). On the question of why copyright cannot be synonymous with intellectual property within digital competence frameworks, Revista de la propiedad inmaterial, 32, 215-231. doi: https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n32.07.
Towse, R. (2018). Copyright reversion in the creative industries: Economics and fair remuneration. The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 41, 467-489.
Work Ukraine (2023). Site Rules and Conditions. Retrieved from: https://www.work.ua/about-us/conditions/.
YouTube (2022). Terms of use. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/t/terms#f617e3e92e.