Principle of freedom of doing business (entrepreneurship) and its implementation into the system of innovative law of Ukraine

Authors

  • Bryntsev Vasyl Full PhD in Law, Professor, Leading Researcher of the Scientific and Research Institute of Providing Legal Framework for the Innovative Development of National Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2021-1(16)-1

Abstract

Problem setting. Despite the ramifications of national legislation on entrepreneurship and real activity on a significant scale of small and medium-sized businesses, as well as a significant amount of research in this area, there are problems that reduce the effectiveness of business results and encourage improvement as a regulatory framework. and mechanisms of the national model of entrepreneurship. The ways to implement the principle of freedom of entrepreneurial activity in the system of innovation law remain unclear.

The purpose of the article is to identify problems that reduce the efficiency of entrepreneurial activity and search for options to improve the existing regulatory framework in the field of innovation, as well as ways to implement in the national model of economic experience of advanced countries.

Analysis of recent researches and publications. A comparative analysis of the results of research by scientists from Georgia (T. Anasashvili, D. Bridze, B. Bolkhvadze, I. Margalitadze), Belarus (E. Voronko, V. Panashchenko), Kazakhstan (S. Moroz) with the conclusions and suggestions of Ukrainian scientists: A. Brevnova, P. Bubenko, D. Zadykhailo and others is carried out.

Article’s main body. In the context of the global economic crisis, the most effective ways out of it are two main directions. The first, global, is due to the unification of states into economic unions and the development of common mechanisms for economic development. And the second, local, is based on a detailed study of international best practices and its implementation in national models of innovative development.

A systematic analysis of the national regulatory framework with the legislation on entrepreneurship of other countries gives grounds for concluding that it is formed on similar conceptual principles, in particular with regard to consolidating the principle of “freedom of enterprise”.

The Doing Business survey periodically determines the ranking of countries in the world regarding freedom of enterprise. The assessment is based on the arithmetic mean of ten control indicators: the process of business registration, the mechanism of connection to energy supply, the process of property registration, credit system, existing tax mechanisms, the degree of investor protection and more. In connection with the unsatisfactory state of development of the economy of Ukraine, attention is focused on ensuring the activities of small business on these criteria in countries that are consistently ranked in international ranking research. In particular, Georgia, China, New Zealand, Singapore and others.

Conclusions. The plans of the Ukrainian authorities to further harmonize the legislation in the field of small business with European standards, to carry out in-depth tax reform and to carry out manifestations of illegal pressure on business deserve support.

In order to accelerate the process of improving the legal framework for entrepreneurship and effective mechanisms for innovation, the conclusions of international experts should be used more widely.

The recommendations of international rating agencies on the need to adopt a realistic strategy for the development of small and medium-sized businesses (entrepreneurship), improve the regulatory framework in the field of lending to small and medium enterprises and improve their access to existing forms of financing, development of entrepreneurship and real action should be implemented. the principle of freedom of its conduct in the field of innovation.

References

Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony: Ratyfikovana Zakonom Ukrainy vid 16 veresnia 2014 r. № 1678-VII i ostatochno ratyfikovana Yevropeiskym Soiuzom vid 11 chervnia 2017 r. Art 343. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011#Text [in Ukrainian].

Ukraina u tsyfrakh 2013: statystychnyi zbirnyk. Kyiv: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy, 2014. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/Arhiv_u/01/Arch_ukr_zb.htm [in Ukrainian].

Abdabekov S. U., Bedelbayeva A. A. (2015). Mirovyye tendentsii razvitiya predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti v ekonomike zarubezhnykh stran. Vestnik Kazakhstanskogo natsionalnogo universiteta – Bulletin of Kazakhstan National University, Ser.: Ekonomika, Vol. 108, № 2/1, 157-163. URL: https://be.kaznu.kz/index.php/math/article/view/1017 [in Russian].

Brevnov A. A. (2006). Organizatsiya chastnogo predpriyatiya v Ukraine. Kharkov: Odisey [in Russian].

Zadykhailo D. V. Hospodarsko-pravove zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi polityky derzhavy. Kharkiv: Yurait, 2012 [in Ukrainian].

Politolohichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk. V. P. Horbatenko, Yu. S. Shemshuchenko, V. D. Babkina, V. P. Horbatenko (Eds.). Kyiv: Heneza, 2004 [in Ukrainian].

Voronko E. N. Pravovoye obespecheniye biznesa. Pravovoye regulirovaniye predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti. URL: https://elib.psu.by/handle/123456789/19375 [in Russian].

Shamkhalov F. (2010). Filosofiya biznesa. Moskva: ZAO «Izdatelstvo «Ekonomika» [in Russian].

Pro pidpryiemnytstvo: Zakon Ukrainskoi RSR vid 7 liutoho 1991 r. № 698- ХІІ. Vtrata chynnosti vid 01 sichnia 2004 r. (1991). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady URSR, 14, art. 168. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/698-12#Text [in Ukrainian].

Pro rozvytok i derzhavnu pidtrymku maloho i serednoho pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini: Zakon Ukrainy vid 22.03.2012 r. # 4618-VI. (2013). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 3, art. 23. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4618-17#Text [in Ukrainian].

Stosovno rekomendatsii parlamenskykh slukhan na temu «Rozvytok pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini i pidtrymku maloho i serednoho biznesu»: Postanova Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy vid 13.04.2016 r. № 1090-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1090-19#Text [in Ukrainian].

Reitynh derzhav svitu z indeksu vedennia biznesu. Doslidzhennia hrupy Vsesvitnoho banku (The World Group) stanom na 11.11.2020 roku [in Ukrainian].

Strany Vostochnogo partnerstva. Indeks ekonomicheskoy politiki v sfere MSP. Otsenka sootvetstviya printsipam Evropeyskogo akta o malom biznese. Ekspertnyy otchet za 2016 god. URL: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjmg6erwK_uAhVh_CoKHcTVALQQFjAAegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oecd.org%2Fglobal-relations%2FSME_Policy_Index_Eastern_Partners_2016_Russian.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3NWWsMWwj40Em_G3rfHuBT [in Russian].

Reshetnikova M. S. (2018). Analiz dinamiki razvitiya innovatsionnogo predprinimatelstva v Kitaye. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki – Problems of Economics and Legal Practice, 3, 102-106 [in Russian].

Wei Zhang. (2012). Constitutional Environment and Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Study. Berkli [in English].

Fey Chzhao. (2014). Sovremennyye usloviya khozyaystvovaniya i osobennosti vnutrifirmennogo planirovaniya na kitayskikh predpriyatiyakh. Transportnoye delo Rossii – Transportation of Russia, 4, 166-169 [in Russian].

Klimova N. V., Glushchenko O. S. (2018). Innovatsionnoye predprinimatelstvo v Kitaye. Fundamentalnyye issledovaniya – Fundamental research, 10, 74-78 [in Russian].

Chun Chen, Zapadnyuk E. A. (2017). Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka malogo innovatsionnogo biznesa v Kitaye: chto mozhno ispolzovat v Belarusi. Izvestiya Gomelskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. F. Skoriny – Izvestia Gomel State University. F. Skorina, 8 (101), 178-180 [in Russian].

Svodnyy otschet. Rossiya i Kitay : innovatsii i predprinimatelstvo. (2016). URL: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwif6tvswa_uAhVDlosKHWelBJoQFjAAegQIAhAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fsk.ru%2Fnews%2Fm%2Fwiki%2F17058%2Fdownload.aspx&usg=AOvVaw2gOm-SvTrbBMqvew59g0RH [in Russian].

Beridze D. G. (2012). Perspektivy razvitiya malogo biznesa v Gruzii. Zbіrnik naukovikh prats ChDTU – Collection of scientific works of ChNTU, Issue. 32, Ch. ІІ, Ser.: Ekonomіchnі nauki, 186-189 [in Russian].

Abesadze Ramaz. (2009). Kakuliya Eteri. Formirovaniye gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya malogo biznesa v Gruzii. Tsentralnaya Aziya i Kavkaz – Central Asia and Caucasus, 6(66) [in Russian].

Frid A., Alfonso F. et al. (2019). Monitoring strategii razvitiya MSP v Gruzii na 2016-2020 gody. Parizh: OECD Publishing. URL: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjdx-Dfuq_uAhVtAxAIHTzIDMkQFjAAegQIAxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oecd.org%2Feurasia%2Fcompetitiveness-programme%2Feastern-partners%2FMonitoring-Georgia%2527s-SMEDevelopment-Strategy-2016-2020-RUS.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3Inw4UgON3NbN4y8u8_Gy- [in Russian].

Sudolskiy R. (2020). Gospodderzhka MSB v stranakh Vostochnogo partnerstva: itogi issledovaniya OyeSD. 31.03.2020. URL: https://smebanking.news/ru/25447-gospodderzhka-msb-v-stranax-vostochnogo-partnerstva-itogiissledovaniya-oecd [in Russian].

Normativno-pravovoye regulirovaniye biznesa v Novoy Zelandii. URL: https://studbooks.net/2230986/ekonomika/normativno_pravovoe_regulirovanie_biznesa_novoy_zelandii [in Russian].

Mikhaylenko M. A. (2020). Zarubezhnyy opyt podderzhki malogo i srednego predprinimatelstva (na primere Singapura). Nauka i sovremennoye obshchestvo: Aktualnyye voprosy. dostizheniya i innovatsii: sbornik statey III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. chast 2 (g. Penza. 23 maya 2020 g.) – Science and modern society: current issues, achievements and innovations: Proceedings of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference, Part 2. Penza, 33-35. URL: https://naukaip.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/%D0%9C%D0%9A-800-2.pdf [in Russian].

Shreyder A. S. Formy i metody gosudarstvennoy podderzhki malogo i srednego biznesa v Respublike Singapur. URL: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjtnZGJva_uAhXvs4sKHXJABFEQFjAAegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F38643067.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1jdq6O5RphH7Ub_sdrG3YF [in Russian].

Bubenko P. H. (2007). Problemy innovatsiinoho pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini. Innovatsiinyi rozvytok Ukrainy: naukove, ekonomichne ta pravove zabezpechennia: Tezy dopovidei Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (m. Kharkiv, 27-28 zhovtnia 2006 r.) – Innovative Development of Ukraine: Scientific, Economic and Legal Support: Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference. O. V. Petryshyn, M. O. Kyzym (Ed.). Kharkiv: VD «INZhEK», 153 [in Ukrainian].

Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti. Omsk: Izdatelstvo SibADI (2007) [in Russian].

Slava S. S. (2018). Razvitiye innovatsionnykh kontseptsiy v Ukraine. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economics of Ukraine, 8 (673), 50-61 [in Russian].

Korzh M. V. (2010). Stratehiia mizhnarodnoho marketynhu: teoriia i praktyka. Kramatorsk: DDMA, 88-89 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2022-02-10

How to Cite

Бринцев В. Д. (2022). Principle of freedom of doing business (entrepreneurship) and its implementation into the system of innovative law of Ukraine. Law and Innovation Society, (1 (16), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2021-1(16)-1

Issue

Section

Articles