Economic and legal regulation of the technology subsystem of the National innovation system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2020-2(15)-15

Abstract

Problem setting. The fact of significant technological lag of the national economy of Ukraine from the countries of the European Union and South and North America is obvious. In addition to the economic components of this trend, of great importance is the lack of necessary organizational and regulatory prerequisites for the mass dissemination of technology transfer and development of public relations for their creation, transfer of rights and implementation in the productive sector of the economy. The current legislation that regulates innovation and determines the status of technology, unfortunately, is a branch of law that has been implemented under the influence of global trends in the spread of these processes and is not the result of natural development of society and business practices. Given the leading, initiating role of innovation legislation, the requirements of which create the preconditions for the development of innovative legal relations, legal science faces an extremely important task – to form such an effective and efficient concept of legal regulation of relations that mediate the circulation of technologies that would interest businesses intensive exchange of scientific developments and their more mass bringing to the level of specific production equipment, machinery, machines and mechanisms.

Analysis of recent researches and publications in the work were investigated the works of scientists such as Yu. Ye. Atamanova, O. D. Svyatotsky, P. P. Krainev, S. F. Revutsky, S. Yu. Poguliayev, K. Yu. Ivanova, O. V. Hladka, A. I. Denisov etc.

Article’s main body. Elements that are part of the technology transfer subsystem: relationships, subjects and objects. Relations that are part of the structure of the technology transfer subsystem of the National Innovation System: (1) Relations within the technology market; (2) Relations within the public-law sector of technology transfer; (3) Relationships involving unorganized ways of creating, transferring and implementing technologies. All entities involved in the technology transfer subsystem of the National Innovative System can be characterized as follows: (a) the author (developer) of the technology; (b) the owner of the object of intellectual property rights (owner of property rights to the object of intellectual property rights) on the basis of which the technology is developed; (c) the recipient of the technology (business entity in which the technology is embodied in the integral property complex); (d) the customer of the technology development process; (e) the state, represented by the authorized bodies of state power, which carries out public administration within the framework of the state technological policy; (f) local governments that, within their competence, influence the specifics of technology transfer within one or more settlements; (g) the investor, the person at whose expense the process of development and further implementation of the technology takes place and is implemented; (h) professional participants (specialized and professional intermediaries), which should include technology brokers, legal entities and individuals providing services related to the use of technology etc. The following forms of technology participation in economic legal relations can act as objects of the technology transfer subsystem of the National Innovative System, namely: (a) material embodiment of technology in the form of an integral technological line and / or experimental design of technology; (b) information implementation of the technology; (c) an integral property complex of the business entity to the production assets of which the technology has already been implemented; (d) technology as an innovative product; (e) technology as an innovative product that is both commodityfunctional and production (industrial) nature.

Conclusions and prospects for development. (1) The main areas of improvement of the current legislation of Ukraine regulating relations in the field of technology circulation are: (a) determination of the legal status of subjects and participants of relations related to the creation, transfer of rights and implementation of such objects; (b) creation of normative “tools” for protection of the rights and legitimate interests of subjects and participants of relations related to the circulation of technologies; (c) creation of a normative field that establishes the list and procedure for the functioning of the organizational principles of the technology market (means of state influence, determination of the limits of such influence, the general procedure for implementation). (2) The necessity of adopting an additional new Law of Ukraine “On Technologies in Ukraine”, which will contain all the necessary regulations that will determine the economic and legal mechanism for regulating relations related to the creation, transfer of rights and implementation of technologies and / or its components, which in fact remained outside the subject of regulation of current regulations. (3) It is proposed to enshrine in the current legislation of Ukraine, in a normative document not lower than the level of the Law of Ukraine, an updated concept of the National Innovative System, which would reflect all relevant features of understanding its structure and interaction; (4) To determine in the current legislation of Ukraine the legal status of the technology transfer subsystem as a separate element of the National Innovation System; (5) To fix in the Law of Ukraine “On state regulation of activities in the field of technology transfer” a list of elements of the subsystem of technology transfer of the National Innovation System, for more adequate formation of long-term legislation, which should serve as a guideline for regulatory impact as an integral object of legal regulation by authorized public authorities.

References

Hetman, A. P., Atamanova, Yu. Ye., Milash, V. S. et al. (2016). Pravove rehuliuvannia vidnosyn u merezhi Internet. S. V. Hlibko, K. V. Yefremova (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Sviatotskyi, O. D. (2003). Pravove zabezpechennia innovatsiinoi diialnosti v Ukraini: pytannia teorii ta praktyky. O. D. Sviatotskyi, P. P. Krainiev. S. F. Revutskyi (Ed.). Kyiv: In Yure [in Ukrainian].

Pohuliaiev, S. Yu. (2002). Peredacha tekhnolohii yak vklad v proste tovarystvo. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis: 12.00.03 «Tsyvilne pravo». Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Prylypko, S. M., Hetman, A. P., Atamanova, Yu. Ye. et al. (2013). Pravove rehuliuvannia innovatsiinykh vidnosyn. Kharkiv: Yurait. P. 448-473 [in Ukrainian].

Hladka, O. V. (2014). Tekhnolohiia yak skladova predmetu komertsiinoi kontsesii. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Yurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho» – Bulletin of the National University «Yaroslav the Wise Law Academy of Ukraine», 2 (17), 188-197 [in Ukrainian].

Denysov, A. I. (2014). Rynok tekhnolohii: pravovi aspekty zabezpechennia interesiv tekhnolohichnoi bezpeky. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Yurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho» – Bulletin of the National University «Yaroslav the Wise Law Academy of Ukraine», Ser.: Ekonomichna teoriia ta parvo, 4, 126-137. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnyua_etp_2014_4_13 [in Ukrainian].

Davydiuk, O. M. (2010). Tekhnolohiia yak obiekt hospodarsko-pravovoho rehuliuvannia. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo «FINN». P. 7-22 [in Ukrainian].

Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 17 chervnia 2009 r. № 680-r «Pro skhvalennia kontseptsii rozvytku natsionalnoi innovatsiinoi systemy». (2009). Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy – Official gazette of Ukraine, 47, art. 1593 [in Ukrainian].

Pro derzhavne rehuliuvannia diialnosti u sferi transferu tekhnolohii: Zakon Ukrainy vid 14.09.2006 r. № 143-V. (2006). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 45, art. 434 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2022-02-11

How to Cite

Давидюк О. М. (2022). Economic and legal regulation of the technology subsystem of the National innovation system. Law and Innovation Society, (2 (15), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2020-2(15)-15

Issue

Section

Articles