Constitutional guarantees rights to entrepreneurial activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2020-2(15)-24Abstract
Problem setting. The article considers the category of freedom of entrepreneurial activity. The normative-legal and organizational-legal guarantees of entrepreneurial activity, enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine, are studied. Particular attention is paid to constitutional restrictions in the field of entrepreneurial activity.
Target of research is to study the constitutional guarantees of ensuring the right to entrepreneurial activity and to identify shortcomings in the mechanism of their implementation.
Analysis of recent researches and publications. The constitutional right to entrepreneurial activity and guarantees of its provision have been the subject of research by many scholars, in particular M.V. Vitruk, B.S. Ebzeev, M.I. Matuzov, M.P. Orzikh, M.I. Kozyubra, V.F. Pogorilka, P.M. Rabinovych, S.V. Riznyk, Yu. M. Todyky, O.O. Chub, V.M. Shapoval, V,S. Shcherbyna and others. Only some aspects of this issue were considered in the special literature, respectively, a comprehensive study of the constitutional guarantees of the right to entrepreneurial activity has not found its proper elaboration.
Article’s main body. The guarantees of the right to entrepreneurial activity provided for in the Constitution of Ukraine are sometimes declarative in nature. This is due to the fact that regulations, specifying the Constitution of Ukraine, contain some inconsistencies and gaps. With regard to the constitutional enshrinement of guarantees of the right to entrepreneurial activity, it is necessary to single out a block devoted to the economic sphere, which will create a systemic impact on the content of current legislation and the practical mechanism for implementing such guarantees.
Conclusion and prospects for the development. The issues of creating conditions for the proper conduct of economic activity by the state are inseparable from the understanding and legal support of the implementation of guarantees of entrepreneurship, which requires an effective legal mechanism for economic management and the creation of appropriate conditions for economic activity.
References
Kovach, A. (2016). Okhorona y zakhyst derzhavoiu konstytutsiinoho prava liudyny na pidpryiemnytstvo. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights, 5/1, 88–92 [in Ukrainian].
Yakovliev, Yu. V. (2002). Subiekty pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti – tovarystva na viri. Odesa: Udacha [in Ukrainian].
Oliinyk, A. Yu. (2017). Konstytutsiine pravo osoby na pidpryiemnytsku diialnist v Ukraini. Aktualni problemy innovatsiinoho rozvytku klasternoho pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini : Vseukrainska naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia (m. Kyiv, 30 bereznia 2017 r.) – Actual problems of innovative development of cluster entrepreneurship in Ukraine: Proceedings of All-Ukrainian scientific-practical conference. Kyiv : KNUTD [in Ukrainian].
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy. Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar. V. Ya. Tatsii, O. V. Petryshyn, Yu. H. Barabash et al. (Ed.). (2011); Nats. akad. prav. nauk Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy : nauk.-prakt. komentar. V. Ya. Tatsii et al. (Ed.). (2003); Akad. prav. nauk Ukrainy. Kyiv: Vyd. Dim “In Yure” ; Kharkiv : Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Hospodarskyi kodeks Ukrainy: Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar: stanom na 1 sichnia 2004 r. V. K. Mamutov (Ed.). (2004). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].
Riznyk, S. V. (2008). Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy yak orhanizatsiino-pravova harantiia konstytutsiinoho prava liudyny i hromadianyna na pidpryiemnytsku diialnist. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava – Journal of Kyiv University of Law, 2, 96–100 [in Ukrainian].
Kovtun, V. I. (2014). Harantii derzhavnoho suverenitetu Ukrainy: konstytutsiini aspekty; M-vo osvity i nauky Ukrainy, Nats. yuryd. un-t im. Ya. Mudroho. Kharkiv: Faktor [in Ukrainian].
Barabash, Yu. H. et al. Konstytutsiina yurysdyktsiia: pidruchnyk. Yu. H. Barabash, A. O. Selivanov (Ed.). (2012); Natsionalnyi universytet “Yurydychna akademiia Ukrainy im. Ya. Mudroho”. Kharkiv. Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Nikolenko, L. M. (2017). Zakhyst prav ta interesiv subiektiv hospodariuvannia v umovakh reformuvannia zakonodavstva. Ekonomika ta pravo – Economics and law, 2 (47), 19–24 [in Ukrainian].
Kucherenko, A. V. (2013). Konstytutsiine pravo liudyny na pidpryiemnytstvo. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu im. Alfreda Nobelia – Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk University of Alfred Nobel, Ser. «Yurydychni nauky», 2(5), 38–44 [in Ukrainian].
Riznyk, S. V. (2008). Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy yak orhanizatsiino-pravova harantiia konstytutsiinoho prava liudyny i hromadianyna na pidpryiemnytsku diialnist. Forum prava – Forum of law, 3, 427–433. URL: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/FP/2008-3/08rsvnpd.pdf [in Ukrainian].
