IP-court: a tool for intellectual property lawyer protection

Authors

  • Petryshak Maria lawyer, master of law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2020-2(15)-23

Abstract

Problem setting. The article examines the problems and prospects of creating a court on intellectual property inUkraine. The experience of the functioning of such judicial bodies in European countries, as well as in Great Britain,Germany and France, is considered.

Analysis of recent researches and publications. It should be noted that the issue of the functioning of the judiciaryand specialized courts in the judicial system of Ukraine is not entirely new to modern science, because to some extentthey were considered by many leading scholars and practitioners, including N. Vilgushinsky, M. Kosyuta, L. Moskvich,I. Marochkina, V. Serdyuk, S. Prylutsky, V. Sukhonos and many others.

Article’s main body. The requirements for applicants for the positions of judges are being studied. It is emphasizedthat there is a too long selection of judges for the Supreme Court on Intellectual Property Issues: overload of economiccourts dealing with cases of this category; interested persons, whose rights are violated in the field of intellectual property,do not apply for the protection of these rights in economic courts, awaiting the formation of a specialized court. Itis noted that effective protection of the violated rights of authors of scientific inventions, utility models, literary andmusical works, computer programs is a guarantee of compliance with the principles of the rule of law and legality, whichare important principles of a democratic state.

Conclusions and prospects for the development. The emergence and full functioning of such an institution inUkraine is an urgent need for effective protection of the rights of individuals in the field of intellectual property. Allchanges to the legislation of Ukraine in general, as well as the legislation governing the consideration of cases in the fieldof intellectual property, must be comprehensive and carefully considered. The ability of a lawyer to protect the violatedrights of authors of scientific inventions, utility models, literary and musical works, computer programs is a guarantee ofadherence to the principles of the rule of law and legality, which are important principles of a democratic state.

References

Pro sudoustrij i status suddiv : Zakon Ukrayiny vid 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII. Verkhovna Rada Ukrayiny. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15 [in Ukrainian]

Orlyuk O., Chernyshuk P. Dosvid patentnyx sudiv u krayinax Yevropy. Yurydychna gazeta online. URL: https://yurgazeta.com/golovna/dosvidpatentnih-sudiv-u-krayinah-evropi.html [in Ukrainian]

Code de la propriété intellectuelle (1992). Version consolidée au 31 mai 2020. URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006069414 [in France]

Federal Act on the Federal Patent Court (2009). As amended up to Act of August 01, 2018 URL: https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classifiedcompilation/20071763/201808010000/173.41.pdf [in English]

Federal Patent Court of the Swiss Confederation. URL: https://www.bundespatentgericht.ch/ [in English]

Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. URL: https://www.gov.uk/courts-tribunals/intellectualproperty-enterprise-court [in English]

Pro utvorennya Vyshhogo sudu z pytan intelektualnoyi vlasnosti: Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrayiny vid 29 veresnya 2017 roku № 299/2017. URL: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/299/2017 [in Ukrainian]

Kujbida R., Smalyuk R. Zvidky vzyavsya i kudy znyk IP-sud? URL: https://rpr.org.ua/news/zvidkyvziavsia-i-kudyznyk-ip-sud/ [in Ukrainian]

Zareyestrovano Vyshhyj sud z pytan intelektualnoyi vlasnosti. Sudova vlada Ukrayiny: oficijnyj veb-portal. URL: https://court.gov.ua/ press/news/889183/[in Ukrainian]

Ovcharenko, Mykola O; Tavolzhanskyi, Oleksii V; Radchenko, Tetiana M; Kulyk, Kateryna D; Smetanina, Nataliia. Combating Illegal Drugs Trafficking Using the Internet by Means of the Profiling Method. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. V. 11. № 4(50), (Summer 2020): 1296-1304 [in English]

Vapniarchuk, V. V., Puchkovska, 1.1., Tavolzhanskyi, О. V., & Tashian, R. I. (2019). Protection of ownership right in the court: The essence and particularities. Asia Life Sciences, 2, 863-879 [in English]

Tsypko, Victoria, Kateryna I. Alieksieieva, Iryna A. Venger, Oleksii V. Tavolzhanskyi, Nataliya I. Galunets, & Alona V. Klyuchnik. « Information Policy of the Enterprise as the Basis for the Reproduction of Human Potential in the Structure of Public Social Interaction.» Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 10.6 (2019): 1664- 1672. Web. 6 Nov. 2020. [in English]

Published

2022-02-11

Issue

Section

Articles